Assertion A: The British followed the policy of Divide and Rule in India.Reason R: They believed that a united India would be a cumbersome hindrance to pursue their interests.Select the correct answer based on the above statements. (2023)

FAQs

Why did the British followed the policy of Divide and Rule in India? ›

The Divide and Rule policy is a strategy that was used by the British during colonial rule in India. This policy was used to keep the Indians divided so that they would be easier to control. The British used this policy to create divisions among the different religious groups, castes, and ethnicities.

'Divide and rule' as a governing precept supposes the pre-existence of an integrated entity. In an India politically united only by British rule – and not yet even by the opposition which it generated – such a thing did not exist. Division was a fact of life.

The main purpose of the British Raj was of course to gain economic profit and political control, but it also managed to unify the subcontinent, introduce western education, a centralized administrative system, a network of railways, etc.

The fearful British Government decided to apply the policy of ' Divide and Rule' to break the unity of the people. Lord Minto decided to make the Indian Muslims against the Hindus and against the Congress. Note: The Act introduced communal representation in Indian politics.

Complete answer: In the middle of the 19th century British divided Indian history into three periods Hindu, Muslim and British. The division was based on a religious manner rather than on the importance of historical changes and development that each period possessed.

Originally it was created to control trade between Britain, India and East Asia. When the Mughal Empire weakened, the East India Company convinced regional rulers they needed British support.

With a population of 78.5 million it was British India's largest province. For decades British officials had maintained that the huge size created difficulties for effective management and had caused neglect of the poorer eastern region. The idea of the partition had been brought up only for administrative reasons.

Muslims left India for Pakistan, mostly heading west, while Hindus and Sikhs made the opposite journey. As many as 20 million people fled. Both sides left devastation in their wake. Documentation is scarce, but hundreds of thousands, and as many as two million people, were killed.

Freedom of speech and press. Higher political knowledge and aspirations. Improvement of government in the native states.

They forced the commercialisation of agriculture with the growing of various cash crops and the raw materials for the industries in the Britain. With the strong political control, the British were able to monopolise the trade with India. They defeated their foreign rivals in trade so that there could be no competition.

What was the impact of British rule in India? ›

Amid social issues like Sati, Child Marriages, Infanticides; ideas like Liberty, Equality, Freedom, and Human Rights were brought by the British. To improve the condition of women in society, various legal measures were introduced. British showed keenness in introducing the English language in Indian society.

The creation and perpetuation of Hindu-Muslim antagonism was the most significant accomplishment of British imperial policy: the colonial project of “divide et impera” (divide and rule) fomented religious antagonisms to facilitate continued imperial rule and reached its tragic culmination in 1947.

Divide and rule (Latin: divide et impera), or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy.

The British Government anticipating danger from the side of Indians in near future because of the growth of unity under the spell of nationalism decided to apply the policy of ' Divide and Rule' to break the unity of the people.

That was part of the end of British Raj, British rule in the Indian subcontinent. One reason for partition was the two-nation theory, which was presented by Syed Ahmed Khan and stated that Muslims and Hindus were too different to be in one country.

What was one reason that India was divided into 2 nations in 1947? Differences between Hindus and the Muslims created religious conflict. During the Indian independence movement , many Muslims in India demanded a separate state in Pakistan to..

The historians have divided Indian history into 'Ancient', 'Medieval' and 'Modern'.

India gained freedom from the British empire on August 15th, 1947. During this time, British India was divided into India and Pakistan. The main reasons behind the partition was British imperialism and the continuous religious conflict between the Hindus and the Muslims.

When war was declared on August 4th, India rallied to the cause. Those with influence within India believed that the cause of Indian independence would best be served by helping out Britain in whatever capacity India could – including the Indian National Congress.

Their Strong Naval power in India, progressively increasing military strength and good leadership, the support the Company received from the Government in England, and the larger resources at its command in Bengal were some of the reasons for the British success in Carnatic wars. 1.

What was the reason according to the British for dividing Bengal? ›

1) Bengal was partitioned on the basis of religion and language. 2) Lord Curzon issued the order to partition Bengal on 16 October, 1915. 3) According to Lord Curzon, the purpose of partition was to bring administrative efficiency in governance.

-Firstly, the area of Bengal was too large and it was difficult for the British to administer efficiently, so Lord Curzon stated that the partition of Bengal was necessary for administrative efficiency. -Secondly, to divide Bengalis into religious and territorial grounds to weaken the growing nationalism in Bengal.

The partition created the independent nations of Muslim-majority Pakistan and Hindu-majority India, separating the provinces of Bengal and Punjab along religious lines, despite the fact that Muslims and Hindus lived in mixed communities throughout the area, Satia said.

The partition caused large-scale loss of life and an unprecedented migration between the two dominions. Among refugees that survived, it solidified the belief that safety lay among co-religionists. In the instance of Pakistan, it made palpable a hitherto only imagined refuge for the Muslims of British India.

In August, 1947, when, after three hundred years in India, the British finally left, the subcontinent was partitioned into two independent nation states: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.

The British used their military might and advanced technology to conquer and keep control of most parts of India. The British Indian Army was made up of roughly two-thirds Indian soldiers hired to defend the British East India Company and later the British government's interests, and just one-third British soldiers.

The consequences of the British rule were that the new education system was available only to the elite and the ruling class, leaving ninety percent of the population uneducated. In addition, there was economic instability, and local industry was destroyed. The textile industry was also damaged.

It made India a virtual hostage of Britains economic machinations which meant breaking away from it would destroy India's economy. mismanagement led to famines: The rule placed more emphasis on the cultivation of cash crops rather than growing crops that would feed India's huge population.

What were the consequences of the British rule in India? British rule was degrading, and supported the need of Britain. Lack of food led to starvation of Indian people, and nationalist perspectives taken up by native Indians.

What was one positive result of the British raj's rule in India? India had developed infrastructure, including railroads and communications.

What were some positive and negative effects of British rule in India? ›

British imperialism caused some negative effects on India through poverty and persecution, but retained more of a positive impact due to its massive improvements in the modernization of India and the overall improvement of Indian civilization.

England, in what is now Britain, wanted more land overseas where it could build new communities, known as colonies. These colonies would provide England with valuable materials, like metals, sugar and tobacco, which they could also sell to other countries.

British economic policies gave them a monopoly over India's large market and cotton resources. India served as both a significant supplier of raw goods to British manufacturers and a large captive market for British manufactured goods.

As the name suggests, divisibility tests or division rules in Maths help one to check whether a number is divisible by another number without the actual method of division. If a number is completely divisible by another number then the quotient will be a whole number and the remainder will be zero.

they followed the policy of deliberate discrimination against the Muslim community hands for the British proceeded the policy of divide and rule to prevent the Indians from uniting remove all the prospects of Revolt the army was reorganize so as to keep it well under British control the proportion of European soldiers ...

They made Urdu as the medium of instruction for Muslims in primary and secondary schools and increased government aid to educational institutions run by the Muslims. Was this answer helpful?

This was intended to weaken the growing tide of nationalism in the country by dividing the people on the communal basis. The impact of this act was also seen in the partition of the country along religious lines. The effects of differential treatment of different religious groups can be seen to this day.

'Divide and rule' as a governing precept supposes the pre-existence of an integrated entity. In an India politically united only by British rule – and not yet even by the opposition which it generated – such a thing did not exist. Division was a fact of life.

British policy of expansion: The political causes of the revolt were the British policy of expansion through the Doctrine of Lapse and direct annexation.

The first Forest Policy adopted by British Colonial Government in 1894 aimed at a custodial and timber-oriented management. The post-independence Forest Policy of 1952 recommended that 33% of the area of the country be brought under forest cover.

Why is it important for India to be divided into states? ›

Why do we have states and union territories? India is the world's seventh largest country and the world's second most populous country soon to overtake China. It is not possible to manage the entire country and its entire population from just one location. Hence, India is divided into states and union territories.

Indian society underwent many changes after the British came to India. In the 19th century, certain social practices like female infanticide, child marriage, sati, polygamy and a rigid caste system became more prevalent. These practices were against human dignity and values.

The British exploited the forests in three ways. Firstly they had a huge demand for wood to be met and cut down large numbers to meet this. Secondly, they cleared large parts of forests to make space for plantations. Thirdly, they wanted to regulate the cutting of trees and passed laws related to it.

They needed timber supply to build their ships in Britain. They needed timber to build railway sleepers and railway lines. They cleared out forests to make way for tea plantations. They wanted to conserve the forests and protect the Indian forest dwellers.

That was part of the end of British Raj, British rule in the Indian subcontinent. One reason for partition was the two-nation theory, which was presented by Syed Ahmed Khan and stated that Muslims and Hindus were too different to be in one country. Pakistan became a Muslim country.

In August, 1947, when, after three hundred years in India, the British finally left, the subcontinent was partitioned into two independent nation states: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.

'The Long Partition'

Crudely, this was a division based upon religious affiliation, with the creation of a Muslim majority in West and East Pakistan and a Hindu majority in India. Between 500,000 and 2 million souls perished as a result of the ensuing upheaval and violence.